Shakespeare's Mystery Identity Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2250 words

Shakespeare's Mystery Identity - Research Paper Example Regardless of their nature, conspiracy theories are, by their very nature, engaging. If it were not for the fact that conspiracy theories and alternate views of history were not engaging and interesting, individuals would not integrate with a belief in them. However, even though a litany of different conspiracy theories exist with respect to the way in which the world exists and what has taken place in the past, a thread of commonality exists between almost all of these conspiracy theories; namely, the dearth of evidence that exists to back them up. One of the more engaging conspiracy theories that exists within literature, and the analysis thereof, is the theory that William Shakespeare was not the sole author of all of the work so that are attributed to him. This theory has many different variants; however, the most popular denotes the fact that William Shakespeare was merely a pseudonym through which different individuals published the work so that it now so commonly and widely be en attributed to William Shakespeare. The first and most common point of interest that those who do not believe William Shakespeare was an individual capable of such works of poetic symbolism and colorful language point to is the fact that the William Shakespeare that exists in recorded history did not possess a formal education. As such, individuals who approach the issue from this particular standpoint Harold the fact that even though William Shakespeare could have been self educated, his overall level of understanding for the English language, unique symbolism, philosophical interpretation, religious overtones, and a firm grasp of history is extraordinarily unlikely for an individual that was not of â€Å"high birth†.... Although it is true that William Shakespeare inherited and â€Å"Honorable† title from his father, this title in and of itself was rather low as compared to the level of education and knowledge that Shakespeare possessed (Kingsley-Smith 158). It must be understood that within the current era, it is quite possible for an individual of low status and low birth to integrate with high levels of education and better themselves in an effective manner. However, within Shakespeare’s time, low birth was akin to a sentence of austerity and relative hardship. As the middle class did not firmly exist within the United Kingdom until the 17th century, it is unlikely that an individual of relatively humble birth could’ve integrated with such a high level of education from such an early age. Another definitive argument that is pointed she was with respect to the fact that William Shakespeare was intimately aware of the affairs of European court. What is meant by this is that eac h and every oil house that existed within Europe, during and before Shakespeare’s lifetime, operated within a given set of defined and traditional guidelines. As such, a familiarity with the way in which British court operated and the Royal decisions were made upon the throne did not extend universally to the way in which French affairs of court, Danish affairs of court, or Italian affairs of court were delineated. As such, beyond merely a great depth in education, Shakespeare was uniquely and seemingly intimately aware of the way in which affairs of court were conducted; blending one to believe that the individual who was ultimately responsible many of Shakespeare’s works was in fact a royal or an esteemed individual with