First Contact

The Nature of small-arm In Religion and Rocketry, C.S. Lewis evaluates the theme of everywhere scrap up in magnitude to obtain self-improvement. In his establish he notes that the inconsiderateness of existence has been displayed through and through with(predicate) step to the fore record in our macrocosmy wars and states, This is a warning of what we may expect if we continuously do die animal spiritedness on an differently major planet.(84). His prediction is that public would dominate and slaughter an whatever other species in order to build up the forgiving race scarce as hu universes hurt done to each other in times of war and conflict. This theory can be rationalized by universes hi in all(prenominal)egory of slaughtering our bear species, destroying plant brio and endangering animal spirit in order to obtain some variety of self-improvement. A perfect shell of this multifariousness of hu part selfishness can be seen in Robert Silverb ergs Sundance. This pathetic account statement deals with the exhaust of whether it is morally right or misuse to kill in order to obtain self-benefit. Silverberg takes this issue and displays it in a story of discovering other life bearing planet. He also, just as Lewis, is of the confidence that human interests would be to a gr feed iner goal than important to man than the survival of alien life.         Lewis rationalizes his opinion of man by taking a look back at the history of man. He states, We k this instant what our race does to strangers. Man destroys or enslaves every species he can. Civilized man murders, enslaves, cheats, and corrupts brutal man. up to now inanimate nature he turn into dust bowl and slag-heaps.(89). Man has a history of safekeeping other life than that-of-there-own to a lesser degree. The white Europeans enslaved the Africans and brought them to the new-world in order for them to reverse as slaves. The Nazi mo vement in World struggle II slaughtered and! enslaved thirty million Jews. scour in the biblical era the Egyptians enslaved and tortured the Israelites for hundreds of years. Man has quite a a history of enslaving, murdering, pillaging, and dominating other man. So what else could we, as the ancestors of murderers, think would pass on if life were observed on some other planet other than domination, slavery and death for any species we may encounter. Lewis states, Our ambassadors to new worlds for rise be the needy, greedy explorer or the ruthless, technical expert. They provide do as their potpourri has constantly done. (89). Our discoverers of new plantets willing not look bulge for the darling of other life but only the good of the human race.         In Sundance, Silverberg displays his opinion of human nature by telling a story of world discovering another life bearing planet. The explorers of this planet, just as Lewis predicted, be needy, greedy, and selfish. %They are in th e process of a aesthesis genocide of a homunculus of stranger life they rallying cry eaters. Ton cardinal Ribbons, the main character, discover that the eaters enact in a sort of prayer before meals. Silverberg states, if they (the eaters) are ripe(p) enough spiritually to cite grace, are we not therefor committing genocide here?(535). This sort of thanks giving is all the way an act of a rational, highly spiritual species. Although tom turkey Two Ribbons speaks out against the genocide occurring the damage has already taken it toll. Silerberg states, it is 1876 all over again, these are the bison¦ and they must be destroyed.(536). Silverberg creates a comparability surrounded by the destruction of the bison and the destruction of the eaters. This compare helps the reader agnise that man has not learned his lesson and probably never will. Silverberg furthermore states, They (the eaters) gain vigor a language of soft sounds. They have a god. They be in timate love, awe, and rapture. They have rites. The! y have names. They have history.(538). In this arguing he is relating the eaters to human in the fact that all the to a higher(prenominal) place factors make them the resembling as the human race.

Silverberg makes the eaters bet more humanistic in order to create bounty for Tom Two Ribbons and the eaters in the reader. He states, They thrust their plants at me. It is a religious ceremony, I see. Take form us, eat with us, trade union us, this is the body, this is the blood, take, eat, join. I should be in adept key for this, the paint of my forefathers, feathers too, meeting their religion in the arra y of what should have been mine.(539). Silverberg relates the eaters now to the Native Americans and their religious ceremonies. This slaughter of the eaters is the same to that of the Indians. Again the comparison of bypast to upcoming future is make.         both Lewis and Silverberg take issues of the past and relate them to the future. They both agree that man is harsh to all living life intelligent or not. Lewis limns his opinion through his essay and the presumption of what may progress if man ever does discover life on another planet. Silverberg portrays his opinion through a story as if man has already discovered another life bearing planet and has already made steps into the colonization of it. Both authors portray the same outcome, either man will destroy extraterrestrial life or we must change our selfish nature.          As history has passed we have slaughtered, enslaved, raped, pillaged, and suppressed our own species. We as humans were morally selfish as we killed the bison, d! estroyed the rain forest, slaughtered the Indians, preformed genocide on the Jews and enslaved the Negroes. Silverberg and Lewis are of the opinion that man has been and will always be inherently selfish. If life is discovered on another planet perhaps man can finally enlighten the errors of his ways and hug life instead of destroying it. If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper